Police Scotland has asked an external force to conduct a review following claims of “unprofessional” conduct within the now-defunct Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency (SCDEA).
Chief Constable Iain Livingstone said the independent peer review, which follows a recent internal review, would be carried out by a force with “significant” experience in covert policing.
The details are contained in a paper presented by the Chief Constable ahead of Wednesday’s meeting of the Scottish Police Authority board.
READ MORE: Undercover policing inquiry hit by conflict of interest claim
The move follows a recent civil action involving a former Grampian Police officer who was seconded to the former SCDEA.
The court case centred around how the former officer was treated following the discovery of mismanagement at the SCDEA’s Special Operations Unit (SOU) in April 2011.
The paper says: “During the former officer’s evidence, a number of assertions were made regarding unprofessional practice, including that documents were destroyed by burning following the April 2011 discovery.”
Mr Livingstone said there was legitimate interest in what had taken place at the SCDEA and he instructed Police Scotland’s Anti-Corruption Unit to review the chronology, previous investigations and steps taken. That review is now complete.
Announcing the next steps, the Chief Constable said in the paper: “It is clear that the events which took place in the legacy SCDEA in 2011, as described in the civil action, were wholly unsatisfactory and unprofessional.
READ MORE: My undercover job gave me post-traumatic stress disorder
“I have now considered Police Scotland review team’s conclusions and recommendations.
“While I am entirely satisfied that the review was a thorough, robust and appropriate response, I recognise the legitimate interest that exists about what took place in 2011, and the importance of public confidence in the vital area of covert policing.
“To that end, I have requested that an external force, which has significant knowledge and experience in the area of covert policing, carry out a peer review to provide independent assurance.
“The purpose of this independent peer review is to ensure all legitimate inquiries have been carried out, and to identify whether there are any further lines of investigation which should be pursued.
“On completion and receipt of the peer review, I will determine what steps, if any, are required to ensure the integrity of the Police Scotland response and provide further public reassurance over this episode.”
The SCDEA, along with Scotland’s eight police forces, merged to form Police Scotland in April 2013.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel