MSPs are set to vote on a call for a funding boost for GPs to tackle recruitment and retention problems.
The Scottish Green plan will be discussed at a debate headed by the party’s Parliamentary co-leader Alison Johnstone tomorrow.
The call aims to highlight the drop in the number of GPs at Scotland’s surgeries as demand for them rises.
Johnstone said: “The Scottish Government’s health and social care strategy encourages healthcare provision within communities, yet the resources are not being made available to support GPs to deliver the quality of care that people expect.
“It’s acknowledged that funding GPs is more cost effective than the alternative, which sees patients heading directly to A&E departments and increasing pressure on secondary care, but the Health Secretary seems reluctant to make the necessary investment which will, ultimately, pay for itself.
“The British Medical Association and RCGP have both called for 11% of the NHS budget to be allocated to GPs.
“This week I’ll bring a vote to Parliament, urging ministers to ensure that adequate support is urgently made available.”
The Scottish Tories also want 11% of the NHS spending to go to GPs to improve recruitment, retention and working conditions.
The party’s health spokesman Miles Briggs said: “Under the SNP local GP surgeries have been starved of resources.
“Since 2012 GP funding in Scotland has not kept up with funding in England. Had Nicola Sturgeon fairly funded Scotland’s GPs they would have had £658 million more today.
“It is little wonder GP practices are closing across the country as they are unable to cope with the growing financial pressures they face and an SNP government which is ignoring the needs of rural GPs.”
According to the 2017 Primary Care Workforce Survey, the number of whole-time equivalent GPs in Scotland has fallen by 160 (4%) since 2013.
Industry body the Royal College of General Practitioners (RCGP) predicted a shortfall of 856 GPs by 2021 – which the Greens said would shift further work to under-pressure Accident and Emergency Departments.
Why are you making commenting on The National only available to subscribers?
We know there are thousands of National readers who want to debate, argue and go back and forth in the comments section of our stories. We’ve got the most informed readers in Scotland, asking each other the big questions about the future of our country.
Unfortunately, though, these important debates are being spoiled by a vocal minority of trolls who aren’t really interested in the issues, try to derail the conversations, register under fake names, and post vile abuse.
So that’s why we’ve decided to make the ability to comment only available to our paying subscribers. That way, all the trolls who post abuse on our website will have to pay if they want to join the debate – and risk a permanent ban from the account that they subscribe with.
The conversation will go back to what it should be about – people who care passionately about the issues, but disagree constructively on what we should do about them. Let’s get that debate started!
Callum Baird, Editor of The National
Comments: Our rules
We want our comments to be a lively and valuable part of our community - a place where readers can debate and engage with the most important local issues. The ability to comment on our stories is a privilege, not a right, however, and that privilege may be withdrawn if it is abused or misused.
Please report any comments that break our rules.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel